Imperial Settlement & the Oil Economy
Imperial settlement, Baku oil, and the parallel emergence of two national consciousnesses.
Russian rule consolidates. The Caucasian Calendar gazetteers map the population year by year. Baku oil produces an industrial proletariat, ethnically stratified between Armenian and Russian capital and Caucasian Tatar (Azerbaijani) labour. The intellectual foundations of modern Armenian and modern Azerbaijani nationalism are laid in the same decades, in Tiflis and Baku, in dialogue with each other and with Russian and European thought.
Capital, oil and class
Russian rule of the eastern Caucasus stabilised after the 1864 conclusion of the Caucasian War. The 1870s opened the Baku oil industry: the Baku Oil District law (1872) ended the state monopoly; the Branobel partnership (Nobel brothers, 1879) and Rothschild capital arrived; by 1901 Baku was producing approximately half the world's oil. Ethnically the industry stratified: Armenian and Russian capital (Mantashev, Lianozov, the Nobels and Rothschilds) and the petty bourgeoisie; Caucasian Tatar (Azerbaijani) and Persian labour. The 1897 Russian Imperial census gave Baku as roughly 36% Azerbaijani, 35% Russian, 17% Armenian, with substantial Persian, Lezgin and Jewish minorities.
Two nationalisms in one century
The intellectual founders of modern Azerbaijani secular culture worked in this period. Mirza Fatali Akhundov (1812-78), who had settled in Tiflis as a Russian Imperial translator from Sheki in the 1830s, wrote the first secular plays in any Turkic language in the 1850s and the explicitly anti-clerical Letters of Kamal-od-Dowleh in 1865. Hasan bey Zardabi founded Əkinçi, the first Azerbaijani-Turkic-language newspaper, in Baku in 1875. The Maarifçilik (Enlightenment) movement that grew from these foundations was Caucasian-Iranic-Turkic, not Pan-Turkist; it oriented toward Tiflis, Tabriz and Saint Petersburg, not Istanbul. The reading list of educated late-Imperial Azerbaijani intellectuals was Russian and Persian, with French and German via Russian translation.
The parallel Armenian intellectual revival ran through the Tiflis press, the Mkhitarist congregation in Venice (founded 1717 but flowering in the 19th c.), and the post-1828 Etchmiadzin revival under the Catholicosate. The Hunchakian (1887, founded in Geneva) and Dashnaktsutyun (1890, founded in Tiflis) parties brought these currents into organised politics. Both nationalisms were products of the same century, in the same Russian Imperial space, drawing on overlapping European source-texts.
The institutional record
The Caucasian Viceroyalty's Caucasian Calendar (Кавказский календарь) gazetteers, published annually from 1846 to 1917, are the principal demographic and administrative record of the period. The 1897 All-Russia Census is the foundational systematic enumeration. The infrastructure of the period included the Tiflis-Baku railway (completed 1883), the Tiflis-Kars line (1899), and the Baku-Batum oil pipeline (1907). Tiflis became the largest Armenian city of the empire (~36% Armenian by 1897, the largest single ethnic group); Baku became the largest concentration of Russian capital, Caucasian-Tatar labour, and a substantial Armenian merchant class.
Tensions accumulating
The same industrialisation that produced Baku's wealth produced its first major inter-communal violence: the 1905 Baku massacres sit at the very end of this period, prefiguring the 1918 March Days. The Hamidian massacres in the Ottoman Empire (1894-96) were across the imperial border but their repercussions were felt across the Caucasus, with Ottoman Armenian refugees flowing into the Russian provinces and the Hunchakian-Dashnak political activity that followed.
The atlas's reading of this period is that it laid the cultural infrastructure of two nations, in close proximity, with overlapping economic interests and parallel political consciousness, before the political instruments to manage their conflict had been built. The next epoch (1905-1917) is when those instruments were tested and largely failed.
Events of the period
Grouped into year-bands so the period reads as a sequence rather than a wall.
Further reading
- Christopher J. Walker, Armenia: The Survival of a Nation, 1980
- Vahakn N. Dadrian, The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus, 1995
- Russian Empire; Ottoman Empire, Treaty of San Stefano, 1878
- European powers; Ottoman Empire; Russia, Treaty of Berlin, 1878
- Donald Bloxham, The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism, and the Destruction of the Ottoman Armenians, 2005
- Raymond Kévorkian, The Armenian Genocide: A Complete History, 2011
- George A. Bournoutian, Eastern Armenia in the Last Decades of Persian Rule, 1807–1828, 1982
- Razmik Panossian, The Armenians: From Kings and Priests to Merchants and Commissars, 2006
- Russian Empire (Nicholas I), Polozhenie ob upravlenii del Armyano-Grigorianskoi Tserkvi v Rossii (Statute on the Administration of the Affairs of the Armenian Apostolic Church in Russia), 1836, 1836
- Ronald Grigor Suny, Looking Toward Ararat: Armenia in Modern History, 1993