Demographics over time · Constantinople · absolute population + headcount Open full view ↗
  • Armenian
040.6k81.1k121.7k162.2k162kEVENTSArmenian162k162k60k50k18971914192320241914war1915atrocity ×31919event

Background

The Armenian Genocide was not only physical destruction. It was also economic expropriation. Deportation created "abandoned" property because the owners were forced out, killed or prevented from returning. The state then converted that forced absence into legal title.

The law

The 26 September 1915 law established liquidation commissions to catalogue, sell and redistribute Armenian movable goods, homes, businesses, farms and accounts. Talaat Pasha's Interior Ministry oversaw the system. Akçam shows that confiscated assets helped finance deportation and supported the formation of a new Muslim commercial class. sourced opinion

Analysis

The term "abandoned properties" was a legal fiction editorial. Armenians had not abandoned their property voluntarily; they were deported under state order. This fiction allowed the state to present plunder as administration and to bind local beneficiaries to the genocide's outcome.

The economic dimension also explains the durability of denial. Recognition threatens not only memory but inherited property, urban development and class formation in post-Ottoman Turkey editorial.

  1. Taner Akçam, The Young Turks' Crime Against Humanity: The Armenian Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing in the Ottoman Empire, 2012
  2. Raymond Kévorkian, The Armenian Genocide: A Complete History, 2011
  3. Taner Akçam, A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility, 2006